Governance Problems at Royal Dutch/Shell

            
 
Strategic Management|Management Strategy |Business Strategy Case Study|Business Strategy|Case Study|Case Studies

ICMR HOME | Case Studies Collection

Case Details:

Case Code : BSTR155
Case Length : 17
Pages Period : 2000 - 2005
Organization : Royal Dutch | Shell
Pub Date : 2005
Teaching Note :Not Available
Countries : UK, Netherlands
Themes: Corporate Governance
Industry : Petroleum and Petrochemicals

To download Governance Problems at Royal Dutch/Shell case study (Case Code: BSTR155) click on the button below, and select the case from the list of available cases:

Business Ethics Case Studies | Case Study in Management, Operations, Strategies, Business Ethics, Case Studies


OR


Buy With PayPal

Amount to be paid:



Prefer to pay in another currency ?
Select Currency for Payment



Exchange Rates: Click Here
Delivery Details: Click Here



Price:

For delivery in electronic format: Rs. 500;
For delivery through courier (within India): Rs. 500 + Shipping & Handling Charges extra

» Business Strategy Case Studies
» Case Studies Collection
» Business Strategy Short Case Studies
» View Detailed Pricing Info
» How To Order This Case
» Business Case Studies
» Case Studies by Area
» Case Studies by Industry
» Case Studies by Company

Custom Search


Please note:

This case study was compiled from published sources, and is intended to be used as a basis for class discussion. It is not intended to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of a management situation. Nor is it a primary information source.



Chat with us

Strategic Management Formulation, Implementation, & Control, 12e

Please leave your feedback

Leave Your Feedback

ICMR India ICMR India ICMR India ICMR India RSS Feed

<< Previous

Introduction Contd...

The internal review report released by Shell on April 19, 2004, stated that the top managers at Shell knew about the inflated reserves for years and had been arguing about whether and how to lie about it to the company's shareholders. The controversy led to the exit of top managerial personnel and a fall in the company's credit ratings8. Apart from shattering investor confidence, the reputation of the company was also badly hit. Analysts were of the opinion that apart from lack of standard policies with regard to reporting and categorization of oil reserves; and absence of third party audits of oil reserves to ensure transparency, one major reason for the crisis was Shell's organizational structure.

Business Strategy | Case Study in Management, Operations, Strategies, Business Strategy, Case Studies

They found that the bi-national Dutch/English ownership structure of Shell with two boards and a Committee of Managing Directors had resulted in lower accountability. Absence of clearly defined roles and responsibilities of the top management made misrepresentation easier. A few analysts believed that Shell would benefit greatly by changing its organizational structure so as to have a single board.

Background Note

The Royal Dutch/Shell Group was formed in 1907 through the merger of the assets and operations of the Netherlands-based Royal Dutch Petroleum Company (RD) and the British-based Shell Transport and Trading Company (STT).

The history of Shell dates back to 1833 when Marcus Samuel opened a shop in London, selling sea-shells. This business quickly developed into a thriving trading company which was later managed by his son, Marcus Samuel Jr. His business visits to the Far East made him realize the potential for supplying kerosene to be used for lighting and cooking, from the developing Russian oilfields, to the large markets in China and the Far East...

Excerpts>>


Custom Search





Economics for Managers Textbook
Textbooks Collection

Economics for Managers Workbook
ICMR books Collection

Case Studies in Business Strategy Volume VI

Case Studies in Business Strategy
e-Book on Business Strategy

Case Study Volumes Collection

8] On April 22, 2004, Moody announced that it was downgrading long-term debt ratings of the Shell group from Aaa to Aa1 because of the company's weaker position in relation to its competitors due to the lowering of its proven energy reserves. Another credit rating agency, Standard and Poor, had already downgraded its rating for the group from 'AAA' to 'AA plus.' Soon after Moody, Fitch also downgraded its ratings for the group to 'AA plus' from 'AAA.'

 

Case Studies Links:- Case Studies, Short Case Studies, Simplified Case Studies.

Other Case Studies:- Multimedia Case Study, Cases in Other Languages.

Business Reports Link:- Business Reports.

Books:- Textbooks, Work Books, Case Study Volumes.